This post may contain affiliate links, which means that if you click on the affiliate link and buy an item, I’ll receive commissions.

TB 117-2013: What Does It Mean For You?

TB 117-2013: What Does It Mean For You?Editor’s Note: My husband and I recently attended a screening of the movie Toxic Hot Seat, made by James Redford (yes, that Redford) and Kirby Walker.  It is a superior piece of story telling that explains the arcane reasons why each one of us is sitting on literally about two pounds of carcinogenic flame retardant chemicals each time we sit on our sofas in our living rooms.  In order to help me explain the current state of the law that led to this situation, I asked (told, really) my husband to write the following post about TB 117-2013 and what it means for us.  Bill is an attorney and founded his own firm six years ago.  He and his team represent businesses and individuals involved in complex litigation throughout the state of California and the U.S.

In this post, we will talk about how flame retardant chemicals ended up in our homes, about the changes to the flame retardant law (now called “TB 117-2013”), and how to get rid of flame retardant chemicals in your furniture.

New Flammability Regulation – TB 117-2013

There is really good news to report regarding the toxic chemicals used to make upholstered furniture in the United States. Ultimately, over the next several years or so, manufacturers will in all likelihood be selling out any inventory they may have of upholstered furniture made with toxic flame retardant chemicals. In the meantime, savvy consumers will have to ask when they buy furniture that it be free of flame retardant chemicals.

New regulations recently went into effect as of January 1, 2014 replacing the 1975 flammability standard for upholstered furniture. This new flammability standard ensures better fire safety without the need of flame retardant chemicals in the filling materials of furniture and baby products.

The Technical Bulletins described here are California regulations. However, because manufacturers have found it too expensive to manufacture both to California’s standards and to standards in other states, the California law affects all upholstered furniture sold in the United States.

Technical Bulletin 117-2013 (“TB 117-2013”) was the first revision to the nearly forty-year old furniture fire safety standard. Under the old law (“TB 117”), all filling materials contained in seating furniture needed to be able to withstand a small open flame for at least twelve-seconds without catching fire. In order to comply with that law, manufacturers infused the filling materials of upholstered furniture with flame retardant chemicals – up to two pounds worth of flame retardant chemicals are used per sofa. Numerous studies of the flame retardant chemicals have raised concerns as to the toxicity of those chemicals and the possible side effects associated with continued exposure including cancer, thyroid disease, developmental problems in children, and reproductive defects among others.

TB 117-2013 Smolder Test

TB 117-2013 replaces the old open flame test with a new “smolder test” done to the furniture covers. The smolder test assesses the furniture’s ability to withstand exposure to more common hazards such as catching fire from a smoldering cigarette and in the place where fires start – on top of furniture, not inside the padding.

While this is a welcome step in the right direction, consumers need to be cautioned. TB 117-2013 does not stop furniture manufacturers from treating upholstered furniture with flame retardant chemicals. The new law does not prohibit their use. The new law simply provides that no chemicals are needed in order for upholstered furniture to meet the new fire safety standards.

More research is needed to determine whether furniture covers would need flame retardant chemicals to pass TB 117-2013 smolder test. So far, experts estimate that approximately 85% of fabrics currently used won’t have a problem passing the test. And the flammability of other fabrics might be improved sufficiently with the introduction of tighter weaves in the fabric.

Products that are exempt from TB 117-2013

In addition, under TB 117-2013, numerous children’s products are exempt from having to comply with fire safety standards. These products include: bassinets, booster seats, car seats, changing pads, floor play mats, highchairs, highchair pads, infant bouncers, infant carriers, infant mattresses, infant mattress pads, infant seats, infant swings, infant walkers, nursing pillows, playpen side pads, playards, portable hook-on chairs, and strollers. Previously, under TB 117, only strollers, infant carriers, and nursing pillows were exempt.

Will new developments undermine TB 117-2013?

Even though TB 117-2013 is officially in effect, full compliance from furniture manufacturers is not required until January 1, 2015. However, on January 16, 2014, Chemtura Corporation filed a lawsuit in Sacramento County, California Superior Court seeking judicial review of TB 117-2013 and an injunction to prevent implementation of TB 117-2013 while this case is being decided. Chemtura is one of the major U.S. manufacturers of flame retardant chemicals. Among other allegations, Chemtura’s complaint states that “[t]he public will be irreparably harmed if [the California Department of Consumer Affairs and the California Bureau of Electronic and Appliance Repair, Home Furnishings, and Thermal Insulation] are not forced to rescind their proposed abandonment of the ‘open flame’ test in favor of a great-relaxed ‘cigarettes only’ testing regime that addresses only risks posed by smoldering cigarettes to the exclusion of risks posed by open flame sources.” On February 28, 2014, the California Attorney General responded on behalf of the named defendants to Chemtura’s complaint requesting dismissal of the case. The court has not granted Chemtura’s request for an injunction as of yet. Until there are further developments, consumers can still expect TB 117-2013 to go into full effect as of January 1, 2015.

What to do with flame retardant chemicals in your home?

If you are in the market for new furniture, you should check for the new “TB 117-2013” tag. But since TB 117-2013 does not prohibit furniture manufacturers from treating upholstered furniture with flame retardant chemicals, customers should still ask furniture sellers whether the item has been treated before purchasing it.

Additionally, many manufacturers will be selling products that are free of flame retardants, but only upon special request of the consumer. Manufacturers are likely to try to sell down their inventories of product that have flame retardants in them before they start selling those that are flame retardant-free.

If you can’t afford to replace your upholstered furniture, contact the Green Science Policy Institute for the location of the foam exchange store closest to you. By replacing your sofa’s cushions with flame retardant-free foam, you will eliminate at least 80% of the flame retardants in your sofa, depending on the sofa’s design. When possible, choose VOC-free certified natural latex foam made with no fillers, as it is made from a renewable resource and does not emit toxic chemicals. This is usually cheaper than replacing your whole sofa, but may still be a bit pricey. You may also want to check with the manufacturer to see if they will swap out the foam in the cushions for a fee.

Conclusion

In sum, if you own a couch or other upholstered furniture, there is a strong likelihood that it contains toxic flame retardant chemicals. Since TB 117-2013 has taken effect, it is possible to purchase furniture that has not been treated with toxic chemicals. However, you have to ask the manufacturer to make sure you’re getting something that is not so treated. Alternatively, the manufacturer or another party may be able to replace the foam in your cushions.

 

 

 

Spread the love

11 thoughts on “TB 117-2013: What Does It Mean For You?”

  1. Valerie Radcliffe

    What about the fire retardants in your car. I just purchased a new car, and am not driving it as the fire retardant smell is so bad. I asked the dealership what the smell was, and they confirmed it is fire retardant in the seat cushions. I have been thru breast cancer, chemo, mastectomy, radiation and reconstruction in the past 3 years, and I hate having to worry about this stuff. Will cars ever be free of this stuff?

    1. I am sorry, Valerie. I do not have comforting news for you. Flame retardant chemicals are used in cars, home insulations, electronics, and even carpeting backing. Some people spent their lifetime to fight against them them. This current law change is a great success and it will take us more years to get rid of them in other places. Let me know if you would like to participate in the movement to regulate toxic chemicals. By the way, HealthyStuff.org rates cars for toxicity. Thanks!

  2. Car seats must comply with the federal motor vehicle flammability standard FMVSS 302, overseen by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. They are not exempt from TB 117-2013. As it is now, most if not all car seats sold in the US are loaded with flame retardants and most manufacturers will not tell you what they are. However, one can send up to 5 foam samples to the Duke chem lab and for free they will tell you exactly which flame retardants are used in the submitted foams. Go to the URL below to submit your samples
    http://foam.pratt.duke.edu/node/67
    They only accept 50 samples per month.

  3. Olga,
    Foam is one component to check for testing. Fabrics can also be treated with flame retardant saturation coats and or flame retardants added into the backing of the material.

  4. Hi Irina,
    This seems to be a dead thread, but perhaps I will a successful attempt at reviving it…I have not found a dedicated post regarding car seats in your blog. But I was very excited to discover you have developed The Ultimate Guide to Non-Toxic Baby Products with lots of useful information, inlcuding car seats. You have mentioned 2 brands that you recommend from the less toxic perspective – Orbit and Nuna Sena. Following your recommendation I decided to go with Orbit and checked it on HealthyStuff.org and it was ranked as a car seat with one of the highest concern. I am puzzled now…. Your thoughts?

    1. Hi Tatiana: Thank you so much for letting me know about this recent test by HealthyStuff.org. The study came out just after I had finished writing the ebook. Based on the test results I can’t recommend Orbit travel system. (My initial recommendation was based on Oeko-Tex 100 certification.) I will be spending a lot of time putting pressure on Orbit. You might want let them know about your disappointment with their product. I have promptly updated my ebook and I will email you the updated file. The updated sections are Strollers and Car Seats. This is an example of why I have been building a membership cite so these changes can be done on the site for all members to see. Thank you, again, for bringing this to my attention!

  5. What about mattresses? How are they affected by this? Are they required to disclose use of FR? I am in the market for a mattress for my daughter & am terribly confused. Please provide some guidance. Thank you.

        1. Yes, I love Maia’s work. You and Maia are my go-to resources for the safest, most non-toxic stuff. (I’ve noticed that many people are writing about “natural” products these days, but they often just repeat info they find online, or take manufacturers’ and retailers’ word at face value.) Thanks so much for having high standards and going the extra mile!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top

Join our community today for inspiration, exclusive content, and vouchers to create a healthy home.  Plus, you'll learn the top 5 safest shampoos, chosen out of 112.

I hate spam, too!  Your email address will NEVER be shared or sold.

x